Learn how Envoy AI Gateway and LiteLLM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .


Both Envoy AI Gateway and LiteLLM have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LiteLLM significantly outpaces Envoy AI Gateway in community adoption with 46,475 stars compared to 1,604 stars on GitHub. This 29.0x difference suggests LiteLLM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LiteLLM has 7,924 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Envoy AI Gateway last updated 3 days ago and LiteLLM 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Envoy AI Gateway uses Golang while LiteLLM leverages Next.js.
LiteLLM has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Envoy AI Gateway which began 2 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests LiteLLM may have more mature features and established processes.
Envoy AI Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0, while LiteLLM's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways. However, they also have distinct specializations: LiteLLM extends into AI Integration Platforms, AI API Key Protection.