Learn how Envoy AI Gateway and LiteLLM differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

LiteLLM appears to have several advantages over Envoy AI Gateway, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LiteLLM significantly outpaces Envoy AI Gateway in community adoption with 56,848 stars compared to 1,943 stars on GitHub. This 29.3x difference suggests LiteLLM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LiteLLM has 10,758 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Envoy AI Gateway and LiteLLM are moving at much the same rate, adding 91 stars and adding 2,599 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+4.9% vs +4.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Envoy AI Gateway last updated 7 hours ago and LiteLLM 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Envoy AI Gateway uses Golang while LiteLLM leverages Next.js.
LiteLLM has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Envoy AI Gateway which began 2 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests LiteLLM may have more mature features and established processes.
Envoy AI Gateway is licensed under Apache-2.0, while LiteLLM's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.
LiteLLM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Envoy AI Gateway may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.