Learn how Bifrost and Envoy AI Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.
Both Bifrost and Envoy AI Gateway have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Bifrost significantly outpaces Envoy AI Gateway in community adoption with 6,903 stars compared to 1,881 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Bifrost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bifrost has 968 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bifrost last updated 5 hours ago and Envoy AI Gateway 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bifrost uses Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bifrost beginning 1 year ago and Envoy AI Gateway 2 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.
Bifrostvs
LLM GatewayActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
