What is the main difference between Bifrost and LLM Gateway?

Bifrost and LLM Gateway are both ai gateways but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Bifrost or LLM Gateway?

The choice between Bifrost and LLM Gateway depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Bifrost to LLM Gateway?

Migration between Bifrost and LLM Gateway is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Bifrost vs LLM Gateway

Learn how Bifrost and LLM Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.

Bifrost

Open-source AI gateway delivering 50x faster performance than alternatives. Access 1000+ models from 8+ providers with built-in governance, fallback, and observability.

Visit Bifrost

LLM Gateway

Route, manage, and analyze LLM requests across multiple providers with one API. Compatible with OpenAI format, includes usage analytics and performance monitoring.

Visit LLM Gateway

Detailed Comparison

Both Bifrost and LLM Gateway have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Bifrost wins

Community & Popularity

Bifrost significantly outpaces LLM Gateway in community adoption with 6,903 stars compared to 1,485 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Bifrost has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Bifrost has 968 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Bifrost last updated 5 hours ago and LLM Gateway 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bifrost uses Python, Golang, Rust while LLM Gateway leverages Next.js.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Bifrost beginning 1 year ago and LLM Gateway 1 year ago.

LLM Gateway wins

Licensing

LLM Gateway uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Bifrost's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.

LLM Gateway wins

Hosting & Deployment

LLM Gateway provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Bifrost may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider

Popular Proprietary Software:

Spotify Alternatives

2 Notion Alternatives

20 Claude Code Alternatives

14 Wispr Flow Alternatives

7 Discord Alternatives

11 Lovable Alternatives

Bifrost vs LLM Gateway: A Detailed Comparison of AI Gateways in 2026

Bifrost vs LLM Gateway

Learn how Bifrost and LLM Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.

Bifrost

Open-source AI gateway delivering 50x faster performance than alternatives. Access 1000+ models from 8+ providers with built-in governance, fallback, and observability.

Visit Bifrost

LLM Gateway

Route, manage, and analyze LLM requests across multiple providers with one API. Compatible with OpenAI format, includes usage analytics and performance monitoring.

Visit LLM Gateway

Detailed Comparison

Both Bifrost and LLM Gateway have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Bifrost wins

Community & Popularity

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Bifrost last updated 5 hours ago and LLM Gateway 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Bifrost beginning 1 year ago and LLM Gateway 1 year ago.

LLM Gateway wins

Licensing

LLM Gateway uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Bifrost's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.

LLM Gateway wins

Hosting & Deployment

LLM Gateway provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Bifrost may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider