Learn how LiteLLM and Portkey AI Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both LiteLLM and Portkey AI Gateway have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LiteLLM significantly outpaces Portkey AI Gateway in community adoption with 46,475 stars compared to 11,669 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests LiteLLM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LiteLLM has 7,924 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LiteLLM shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Portkey AI Gateway was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests LiteLLM is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LiteLLM uses Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with LiteLLM beginning 3 years ago and Portkey AI Gateway 3 years ago.
Portkey AI Gateway is licensed under MIT, while LiteLLM's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways. However, they also have distinct specializations: LiteLLM also focuses on AI Integration Platforms, AI API Key Protection.