Learn how LiteLLM and Portkey AI Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

LiteLLM appears to have several advantages over Portkey AI Gateway, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LiteLLM significantly outpaces Portkey AI Gateway in community adoption with 56,848 stars compared to 12,777 stars on GitHub. This 4.4x difference suggests LiteLLM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LiteLLM has 10,758 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LiteLLM is growing faster, adding 2,599 stars in the last 30 days (+4.8%) against adding 284 stars for Portkey AI Gateway (+2.3%). LiteLLM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
LiteLLM shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Portkey AI Gateway was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests LiteLLM is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LiteLLM uses Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with LiteLLM beginning 3 years ago and Portkey AI Gateway 3 years ago.
Portkey AI Gateway is licensed under MIT, while LiteLLM's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.
LiteLLM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Portkey AI Gateway may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.