Learn how LiteLLM and Portkey AI Gateway differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai gateways is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.108.3Self-hosted
YesRepository
berriai/litellm
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 months agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.15.2License
MITRepository
portkey-ai/gateway
LiteLLM appears to have several advantages over Portkey AI Gateway, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LiteLLM significantly outpaces Portkey AI Gateway in community adoption with 62,946 stars compared to 13,349 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests LiteLLM has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LiteLLM has 13,128 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LiteLLM is growing faster, adding 2,048 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 188 stars for Portkey AI Gateway (+1.4%). LiteLLM is both larger and pulling further ahead.
LiteLLM shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while Portkey AI Gateway was last updated 6 months ago. This suggests LiteLLM is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LiteLLM uses Bash, Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with LiteLLM beginning 3 years ago and Portkey AI Gateway 3 years ago.
Portkey AI Gateway is licensed under MIT, while LiteLLM's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Gateways.
LiteLLM provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Portkey AI Gateway may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.