Docuseal significantly outpaces Wraft in community adoption with 18,243 stars compared to 158 stars on GitHub. This 115.5x difference suggests Docuseal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docuseal has 1,814 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Docuseal is growing faster, adding 734 stars in the last 30 days (+4.2%) against adding 5 stars for Wraft (+3.3%). Docuseal is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Docuseal shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Wraft was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Docuseal is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Docuseal uses SCSS, Vue, Ruby while Wraft leverages CSS, Bash, Rust, Lua, Elixir.

Docuseal has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Wraft which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Docuseal may have more mature features and established processes.

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Both tools serve similar use cases in E-Signature Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wraft extends into Document Management Systems.

Both Docuseal and Wraft offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.