Learn how Docuseal and OpenSign differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these e-signature platforms is best for you.

Docuseal appears to have several advantages over OpenSign, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Docuseal leads in popularity with 18,243 stars vs 6,804 stars for OpenSign. The 168% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Docuseal has 1,814 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Docuseal is growing faster, adding 734 stars in the last 30 days (+4.2%) against adding 167 stars for OpenSign (+2.5%). Docuseal is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Docuseal last updated 4 hours ago and OpenSign 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Docuseal uses SCSS, Vue, Ruby while OpenSign leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Docuseal beginning 3 years ago and OpenSign 3 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in E-Signature Platforms.
Both Docuseal and OpenSign offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository