What is the main difference between OpenSign and Wraft?

OpenSign and Wraft are both e-signature platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenSign or Wraft?

The choice between OpenSign and Wraft depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenSign to Wraft?

Migration between OpenSign and Wraft is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

OpenSign vs Wraft

Learn how OpenSign and Wraft differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these e-signature platforms is best for you.

OpenSign

A powerful, open-source e-signature solution offering customization, integration, and enhanced security for businesses of all sizes.

Visit OpenSign Read more

7,081stars+101(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v2.41.3
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
opensignlabs/opensign

Wraft

Complete document lifecycle management with automated generation, approval workflows, e-signatures, and branded templates. Create professional documents at scale.

Visit Wraft Read more

167stars+2(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.6.7
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
wraft/wraft

Detailed Comparison

Both OpenSign and Wraft have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

OpenSign wins

Community & Popularity

OpenSign significantly outpaces Wraft in community adoption with 7,081 stars compared to 167 stars on GitHub. This 42.4x difference suggests OpenSign has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSign has 839 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

OpenSign and Wraft are moving at much the same rate, adding 101 stars and adding 2 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Wraft wins

Development Activity

Wraft shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 days ago, while OpenSign was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Wraft is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenSign uses Typescript, JSX while Wraft leverages Rust, Lua, Elixir.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with OpenSign beginning 3 years ago and Wraft 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in E-Signature Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wraft extends into Document Management Systems.

Comparable