What is the main difference between OpenSign and Wraft?

OpenSign and Wraft are both e-signature platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenSign or Wraft?

The choice between OpenSign and Wraft depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenSign to Wraft?

Migration between OpenSign and Wraft is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn more

OpenSign vs Wraft

Learn how OpenSign and Wraft differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these e-signature platforms is best for you.

OpenSign

A powerful, open-source e-signature solution offering customization, integration, and enhanced security for businesses of all sizes.

Visit OpenSign Read more

7,201stars+155(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v3.1.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
opensign

Wraft

Complete document lifecycle management with automated generation, approval workflows, e-signatures, and branded templates. Create professional documents at scale.

Visit Wraft Read more

167stars+1(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
28 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.6.7
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
wraft/wraft

Detailed Comparison

OpenSign appears to have several advantages over Wraft, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

OpenSign wins

Community & Popularity

OpenSign significantly outpaces Wraft in community adoption with 7,201 stars compared to 167 stars on GitHub. This 43.1x difference suggests OpenSign has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenSign has 851 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

OpenSign wins

Growth Momentum

OpenSign is growing faster, adding 155 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 1 stars for Wraft (+0.6%). OpenSign is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenSign last updated 13 hours ago and Wraft 28 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenSign uses Typescript, JSX while Wraft leverages Rust, Lua, Elixir.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with OpenSign beginning 3 years ago and Wraft 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in E-Signature Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wraft extends into Document Management Systems.

Comparable