Documenso vs Wraft
Learn how Documenso and Wraft differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these e-signature platforms is best for you.
Learn how Documenso and Wraft differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these e-signature platforms is best for you.
Documenso
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.21.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
documenso/documenso
Wraft
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.6.7License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
wraft/wraft
Detailed Comparison
Documenso appears to have several advantages over Wraft, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Documenso appears to have several advantages over Wraft, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Documenso significantly outpaces Wraft in community adoption with 15,696 stars compared to 168 stars on GitHub. This 93.4x difference suggests Documenso has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Documenso has 3,460 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Documenso is growing faster, adding 319 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 1 stars for Wraft (+0.6%). Documenso is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Documenso shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while Wraft was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Documenso is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Documenso uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Wraft leverages Rust, Lua, Elixir.
Project Maturity
Documenso has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Wraft which began 2 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Documenso may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in E-Signature Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Wraft extends into Document Management Systems.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Documenso and Wraft offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.