Learn how Darktable and RapidRAW differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.6.7License
AGPL-3.0Repository
cybertimon/rapidraw
Both Darktable and RapidRAW have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Darktable having 13,329 stars and RapidRAW having 10,706 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Darktable has 1,495 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
RapidRAW is growing faster, adding 508 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 192 stars for Darktable (+1.5%). RapidRAW is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darktable last updated 6 hours ago and RapidRAW 18 hours ago.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to RapidRAW which began 1 year ago. This 13.4-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Darktable is licensed under GPL-3.0 while RapidRAW uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.