Learn how RapidRAW and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v1.6.7License
AGPL-3.0Repository
cybertimon/rapidraw
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
5.13License
GPL-3.0Repository
rawtherapee
Both RapidRAW and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
RapidRAW leads in popularity with 10,706 stars vs 4,252 stars for RawTherapee. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, RapidRAW has 630 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
RapidRAW is growing faster, adding 508 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 68 stars for RawTherapee (+1.6%). RapidRAW is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with RapidRAW last updated 18 hours ago and RawTherapee 6 days ago.
RawTherapee has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to RapidRAW which began 1 year ago. This 10.0-year head start suggests RawTherapee may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: RapidRAW is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while RawTherapee uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.