Learn how Cosmos Server and YunoHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.23.4Self-hosted
YesRepository
cosmos-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
12.1.41.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
yunohost/yunohost
YunoHost appears to have several advantages over Cosmos Server, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cosmos Server leads in popularity with 6,195 stars vs 2,992 stars for YunoHost. The 107% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, YunoHost has 353 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
YunoHost is growing faster, adding 17 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 17 stars for Cosmos Server (+0.3%). YunoHost is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cosmos Server last updated 18 days ago and YunoHost 9 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cosmos Server uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang while YunoHost leverages Python.
YunoHost has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cosmos Server which began 4 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests YunoHost may have more mature features and established processes.
YunoHost is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels, Home Server Platforms.
Both Cosmos Server and YunoHost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.