Learn how Cosmos Server and YunoHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Cosmos Server and YunoHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cosmos Server leads in popularity with 6,121 stars vs 2,967 stars for YunoHost. The 106% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, YunoHost has 351 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cosmos Server is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 12 stars for YunoHost (+0.4%). Cosmos Server is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cosmos Server last updated 1 day ago and YunoHost 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cosmos Server uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Golang while YunoHost leverages Python.
YunoHost has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cosmos Server which began 4 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests YunoHost may have more mature features and established processes.
YunoHost is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Both Cosmos Server and YunoHost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.