Learn how CasaOS and Cosmos Server differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

CasaOS appears to have several advantages over Cosmos Server, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CasaOS significantly outpaces Cosmos Server in community adoption with 37,210 stars compared to 6,149 stars on GitHub. This 6.1x difference suggests CasaOS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CasaOS has 2,190 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CasaOS and Cosmos Server are moving at much the same rate, adding 199 stars and adding 37 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Cosmos Server shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while CasaOS was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Cosmos Server is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cosmos Server leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX.
CasaOS has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Cosmos Server which began 4 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests CasaOS may have more mature features and established processes.
CasaOS is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Both CasaOS and Cosmos Server offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.