Learn how CasaOS and Cosmos Server differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these server & vm management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

CasaOS appears to have several advantages over Cosmos Server, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CasaOS significantly outpaces Cosmos Server in community adoption with 34,099 stars compared to 5,976 stars on GitHub. This 5.7x difference suggests CasaOS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CasaOS has 1,932 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Cosmos Server shows more recent development activity with its last commit 25 days ago, while CasaOS was last updated 11 months ago. This suggests Cosmos Server is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cosmos Server leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX.
CasaOS has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Cosmos Server which began 3 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests CasaOS may have more mature features and established processes.
CasaOS is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Server & VM Management.
Both CasaOS and Cosmos Server offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.