Learn how CasaOS and Cosmos Server differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.4.15License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
icewhaletech/casaos
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.23.4Self-hosted
YesRepository
cosmos-server
CasaOS appears to have several advantages over Cosmos Server, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CasaOS significantly outpaces Cosmos Server in community adoption with 37,592 stars compared to 6,195 stars on GitHub. This 6.1x difference suggests CasaOS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CasaOS has 2,224 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CasaOS is growing faster, adding 298 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 17 stars for Cosmos Server (+0.3%). CasaOS is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CasaOS last updated 1 month ago and Cosmos Server 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cosmos Server leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX.
CasaOS has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Cosmos Server which began 4 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests CasaOS may have more mature features and established processes.
CasaOS is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Cosmos Server's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels, Home Server Platforms.
Both CasaOS and Cosmos Server offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.