Learn how CasaOS and YunoHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these server & vm management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 9 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both CasaOS and YunoHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CasaOS significantly outpaces YunoHost in community adoption with 33,790 stars compared to 2,891 stars on GitHub. This 11.7x difference suggests CasaOS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CasaOS has 1,904 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
YunoHost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while CasaOS was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests YunoHost is being more actively maintained.
CasaOS uses Typescript, Golang while YunoHost leverages Bash, Python.
YunoHost has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CasaOS which began 5 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests YunoHost may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: CasaOS is licensed under Apache-2.0 while YunoHost uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Server & VM Management.
Both CasaOS and YunoHost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.