Learn how CasaOS and YunoHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these control panels is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both CasaOS and YunoHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
CasaOS significantly outpaces YunoHost in community adoption with 37,210 stars compared to 2,976 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests CasaOS has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CasaOS has 2,190 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CasaOS and YunoHost are moving at much the same rate, adding 199 stars and adding 14 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
YunoHost shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while CasaOS was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests YunoHost is being more actively maintained.
CasaOS uses Typescript, Golang while YunoHost leverages Bash, Python.
YunoHost has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to CasaOS which began 5 years ago. This 7.5-year head start suggests YunoHost may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: CasaOS is licensed under Apache-2.0 while YunoHost uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Control Panels.
Both CasaOS and YunoHost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.