Learn how Cody and OpenHands differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over Cody, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands significantly outpaces Cody in community adoption with 83,729 stars compared to 87 stars on GitHub. This 962.4x difference suggests OpenHands has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 10,827 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cody last updated 9 days ago and OpenHands 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cody uses Golang, C, Rust, PHP, Java, C++, Kotlin.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cody beginning 2 years ago and OpenHands 2 years ago.
OpenHands uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cody's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Cody also focuses on AI Coding Assistants while OpenHands extends into AI Coding Agents.
OpenHands provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cody may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository