Learn how Cody and OpenHands differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding assistants is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over Cody, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands significantly outpaces Cody in community adoption with 81,715 stars compared to 86 stars on GitHub. This 950.2x difference suggests OpenHands has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 10,450 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cody last updated 7 days ago and OpenHands 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cody uses Golang, Rust, C, PHP, Java, C++, Kotlin.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cody beginning 2 years ago and OpenHands 2 years ago.
OpenHands uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Cody's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenHands extends into AI Coding Agents.
OpenHands provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cody may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.