Learn how Apache Cloudberry and Databend differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Apache Cloudberry and Databend have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Databend significantly outpaces Apache Cloudberry in community adoption with 9,452 stars compared to 1,417 stars on GitHub. This 6.7x difference suggests Databend has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Databend has 900 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Apache Cloudberry is growing faster, adding 38 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 26 stars for Databend (+0.3%). Apache Cloudberry is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Cloudberry last updated 21 hours ago and Databend 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache Cloudberry uses CSS, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl while Databend leverages JavaScript, Rust.
Databend has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Apache Cloudberry which began 3 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Databend may have more mature features and established processes.
Apache Cloudberry is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Databend's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL), Cloud Data Warehouses.
Databend provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Apache Cloudberry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.