Learn how ClickHouse and Apache Cloudberry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud data warehouses is best for you.

ClickHouse appears to have several advantages over Apache Cloudberry, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
ClickHouse significantly outpaces Apache Cloudberry in community adoption with 48,944 stars compared to 1,250 stars on GitHub. This 39.2x difference suggests ClickHouse has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ClickHouse has 8,708 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with ClickHouse last updated 4 hours ago and Apache Cloudberry 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ClickHouse uses JavaScript, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, C#.
ClickHouse has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Apache Cloudberry which began 3 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests ClickHouse may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Data Warehouses. However, they also have distinct specializations: Apache Cloudberry extends into Relational Databases (SQL).
ClickHouse provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Apache Cloudberry may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository