Apache Cloudberry vs CrateDB
Learn how Apache Cloudberry and CrateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Learn how Apache Cloudberry and CrateDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Apache Cloudberry
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
2.1.0-incubatingLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
cloudberrydb/cloudberrydb
CrateDB
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
6.4.5License
Apache-2.0Repository
crate/crate
Detailed Comparison
Both Apache Cloudberry and CrateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Apache Cloudberry and CrateDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
CrateDB significantly outpaces Apache Cloudberry in community adoption with 4,441 stars compared to 1,417 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests CrateDB has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, CrateDB has 618 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Apache Cloudberry is growing faster, adding 38 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 10 stars for CrateDB (+0.2%). Apache Cloudberry is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Cloudberry last updated 21 hours ago and CrateDB 4 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache Cloudberry uses CSS, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl while CrateDB leverages Java.
Project Maturity
CrateDB has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Apache Cloudberry which began 3 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests CrateDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL). However, they also have distinct specializations: Apache Cloudberry also focuses on Cloud Data Warehouses while CrateDB extends into IoT Databases.
Postiz – The All-in-One agentic social media scheduling tool