Learn how CartCut and OpenShot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.6.0License
MITRepository
cartesiancs/cartcut
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v4.0.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
openshot/openshot-qt
Both CartCut and OpenShot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenShot significantly outpaces CartCut in community adoption with 6,693 stars compared to 818 stars on GitHub. This 8.2x difference suggests OpenShot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenShot has 830 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
CartCut is growing faster, adding 62 stars in the last 30 days (+8.2%) against adding 144 stars for OpenShot (+2.2%). CartCut is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CartCut last updated 9 hours ago and OpenShot 9 hours ago.
OpenShot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to CartCut which began 4 years ago. This 7.3-year head start suggests OpenShot may have more mature features and established processes.
CartCut uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenShot's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors.