Learn how CartCut and Kdenlive differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.6.0License
MITRepository
cartesiancs/cartcut
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
kde/kdenlive
Both CartCut and Kdenlive have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kdenlive significantly outpaces CartCut in community adoption with 5,935 stars compared to 818 stars on GitHub. This 7.3x difference suggests Kdenlive has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kdenlive has 541 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
CartCut is growing faster, adding 62 stars in the last 30 days (+8.2%) against adding 193 stars for Kdenlive (+3.4%). CartCut is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CartCut last updated 9 hours ago and Kdenlive 12 hours ago.
Kdenlive has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to CartCut which began 4 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Kdenlive may have more mature features and established processes.
CartCut uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kdenlive's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors.