Learn how Apache Airflow and Mage differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.3.2License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apache/airflow
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
0.9.80License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
mage-ai/mage-ai
Apache Airflow appears to have several advantages over Mage, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Airflow significantly outpaces Mage in community adoption with 47,279 stars compared to 8,837 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Apache Airflow has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Airflow has 18,151 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache Airflow is growing faster, adding 293 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 11 stars for Mage (+0.1%). Apache Airflow is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Airflow last updated 7 hours ago and Mage 3 days ago.
Apache Airflow has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Mage which began 4 years ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Apache Airflow may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mage extends into ETL & Data Integration.
Both Apache Airflow and Mage offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.