Learn how Apache Airflow and Prefect differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.3.2License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apache/airflow
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
3.9.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
prefecthq/prefect
Apache Airflow appears to have several advantages over Prefect, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Airflow leads in popularity with 47,279 stars vs 24,076 stars for Prefect. The 96% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Airflow has 18,151 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache Airflow and Prefect are moving at much the same rate, adding 293 stars and adding 145 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.6%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Airflow last updated 7 hours ago and Prefect 7 hours ago.
Apache Airflow has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Prefect which began 8 years ago. This 3.3-year head start suggests Apache Airflow may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration.
Both Apache Airflow and Prefect offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.