Learn how Apache Airflow and Kestra differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow orchestration tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
3.3.2License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apache/airflow
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v2.0.7License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kestra-io/kestra
Both Apache Airflow and Kestra have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache Airflow leads in popularity with 47,279 stars vs 30,000 stars for Kestra. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Apache Airflow has 18,151 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kestra is growing faster, adding 1,632 stars in the last 30 days (+5.8%) against adding 293 stars for Apache Airflow (+0.6%). Kestra is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache Airflow last updated 7 hours ago and Kestra 7 hours ago.
Apache Airflow has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Kestra which began 7 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Apache Airflow may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Orchestration. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kestra extends into ETL & Data Integration.
Both Apache Airflow and Kestra offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.