Learn how ActivePieces and Langflow differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Langflow appears to have several advantages over ActivePieces, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Langflow significantly outpaces ActivePieces in community adoption with 147,832 stars compared to 22,099 stars on GitHub. This 6.7x difference suggests Langflow has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Langflow has 8,924 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 12 hours ago and Langflow 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Langflow leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with ActivePieces beginning 3 years ago and Langflow 3 years ago.
Langflow is licensed under MIT, while ActivePieces's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on Workflow Automation, API Integration while Langflow extends into AI Agent Platforms, LLM Application Frameworks.
Both ActivePieces and Langflow offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.