Learn how Vikunja and Will Be Done differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v2.7.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
go-vikunja/vikunja
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
9 monthsVersion
v0.12.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
will-be-done
Vikunja appears to have several advantages over Will Be Done, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Vikunja significantly outpaces Will Be Done in community adoption with 5,857 stars compared to 158 stars on GitHub. This 37.1x difference suggests Vikunja has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Vikunja has 777 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Vikunja is growing faster, adding 333 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 7 stars for Will Be Done (+4.6%). Vikunja is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Vikunja last updated 10 hours ago and Will Be Done 2 days ago.
Vikunja has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Will Be Done which began 9 months ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Vikunja may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Vikunja also focuses on Project Management Suites.
Both Vikunja and Will Be Done offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs