What is the main difference between Skyvern and Steel?

Skyvern and Steel are both browser automation for ai tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Skyvern or Steel?

The choice between Skyvern and Steel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Skyvern to Steel?

Migration between Skyvern and Steel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Skyvern vs Steel

Learn how Skyvern and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

Skyvern

Transform manual browser tasks into automated workflows using AI. Handle complex forms, CAPTCHAs, 2FA, and data extraction across any website at scale.

Visit Skyvern Read more

22,790stars+267(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.0.50
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
skyvern-ai/skyvern

Steel

Open-source browser API designed for AI agents. Run headless browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving, proxy support, and session management. Quick setup in under 1s.

Visit Steel Read more

7,509stars+155(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.5.3-beta
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
steel-dev/steel-browser

Detailed Comparison

Both Skyvern and Steel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Skyvern wins

Community & Popularity

Skyvern significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 22,790 stars compared to 7,509 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Skyvern has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Skyvern has 2,140 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Steel wins

Growth Momentum

Steel is growing faster, adding 155 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 267 stars for Skyvern (+1.2%). Steel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Skyvern last updated 20 hours ago and Steel 12 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Skyvern uses Python.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Skyvern beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Steel uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Automation for AI. However, they also have distinct specializations: Skyvern also focuses on Workflow Automation while Steel extends into Browser Automation.

Other tool comparisons to consider