What is the main difference between Skyvern and Steel?

Skyvern and Steel are both browser automation for ai tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Skyvern or Steel?

The choice between Skyvern and Steel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Skyvern to Steel?

Migration between Skyvern and Steel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.

Learn More

Learn more

Skyvern vs Steel

Learn how Skyvern and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

Skyvern

Transform manual browser tasks into automated workflows using AI. Handle complex forms, CAPTCHAs, 2FA, and data extraction across any website at scale.

Visit Skyvern Read more

Stars
21,561
Forks
1,989
Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
AGPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 6 hours ago.

Steel

Open-source browser API designed for AI agents. Run headless browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving, proxy support, and session management. Quick setup in under 1s.

Visit Steel Read more

Stars
7,010
Forks
931
Last commit
8 days ago
Repository age
2 years
License
Apache-2.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 6 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both Skyvern and Steel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Skyvern wins

Community & Popularity

Skyvern significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 21,561 stars compared to 7,010 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Skyvern has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Skyvern has 1,989 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Skyvern last updated 10 hours ago and Steel 8 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Skyvern uses Python.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Skyvern beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Steel uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Automation for AI. However, they also have distinct specializations: Skyvern also focuses on Workflow Automation while Steel extends into Browser Automation.

Other tool comparisons to consider