What is the main difference between Skyvern and Steel?

Skyvern and Steel are both browser automation for ai tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Skyvern or Steel?

The choice between Skyvern and Steel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Skyvern to Steel?

Migration between Skyvern and Steel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Skyvern vs Steel

Learn how Skyvern and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

Skyvern

Transform manual browser tasks into automated workflows using AI. Handle complex forms, CAPTCHAs, 2FA, and data extraction across any website at scale.

Visit Skyvern

Steel

Open-source browser API designed for AI agents. Run headless browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving, proxy support, and session management. Quick setup in under 1s.

Visit Steel

Detailed Comparison

Skyvern appears to have several advantages over Steel, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Skyvern wins

Community & Popularity

Skyvern significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 22,744 stars compared to 7,475 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Skyvern has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Skyvern has 2,138 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Skyvern wins

Growth Momentum

Skyvern is growing faster, adding 522 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 142 stars for Steel (+1.9%). Skyvern is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Skyvern last updated 21 hours ago and Steel 8 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Skyvern uses Python.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Skyvern beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Steel uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Automation for AI. However, they also have distinct specializations: Skyvern also focuses on Workflow Automation while Steel extends into Browser Automation.

Other tool comparisons to consider

Popular Proprietary Software:

Claude Code Alternatives

12 Spotify Alternatives

2 Notion Alternatives

20 Wispr Flow Alternatives

7 Lovable Alternatives

3 Discord Alternatives

11 CapCut Alternatives

5 n8n Alternatives

6 Cursor Alternatives

8 Microsoft Word Alternatives

5 Codex Alternatives

17 Adobe Photoshop Alternatives

Popular Categories:

Low-Code/No-Code Platforms

36 Project Management Suites

20 AI Agent Platforms

21 Infrastructure Monitoring Tools

18 PaaS & Deployment Tools

18 Team Chat & Messaging Tools

Skyvern vs Steel: A Detailed Comparison of Browser Automation for AI Tools in 2026

Skyvern vs Steel

Learn how Skyvern and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

Skyvern

Transform manual browser tasks into automated workflows using AI. Handle complex forms, CAPTCHAs, 2FA, and data extraction across any website at scale.

Visit Skyvern

Steel

Open-source browser API designed for AI agents. Run headless browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving, proxy support, and session management. Quick setup in under 1s.

Visit Steel

Detailed Comparison

Skyvern appears to have several advantages over Steel, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Skyvern wins

Community & Popularity

Skyvern wins

Growth Momentum

Skyvern is growing faster, adding 522 stars in the last 30 days (+2.3%) against adding 142 stars for Steel (+1.9%). Skyvern is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Skyvern last updated 21 hours ago and Steel 8 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Skyvern uses Python.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Skyvern beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Steel uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Other tool comparisons to consider