Learn how Browser Use and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Browser Use appears to have several advantages over Steel, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Browser Use significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 109,761 stars compared to 7,509 stars on GitHub. This 14.6x difference suggests Browser Use has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Browser Use has 12,066 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Browser Use is growing faster, adding 4,044 stars in the last 30 days (+3.8%) against adding 155 stars for Steel (+2.1%). Browser Use is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Browser Use last updated 7 hours ago and Steel 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Browser Use uses Python while Steel leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Browser Use beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.
Browser Use uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Steel's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Automation for AI, Browser Automation.