What is the main difference between Browser Use and Steel?

Browser Use and Steel are both browser automation for ai tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Browser Use or Steel?

The choice between Browser Use and Steel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Browser Use to Steel?

Migration between Browser Use and Steel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.

Learn More

Learn more

Browser Use vs Steel

Learn how Browser Use and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

Browser Use

Python library that lets AI agents browse the web by giving them real browser control, DOM access, and the ability to interact with any website.

Visit Browser Use Read more

Stars
99,639
Forks
11,111
Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
MIT

Activity score

100/100

View Repository

Steel

Open-source browser API designed for AI agents. Run headless browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving, proxy support, and session management. Quick setup in under 1s.

Visit Steel Read more

Stars
7,192
Forks
938
Last commit
11 days ago
Repository age
2 years
License
Apache-2.0

Activity score

88/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Browser Use appears to have several advantages over Steel, particularly in popularity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Browser Use wins

Community & Popularity

Browser Use significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 99,639 stars compared to 7,192 stars on GitHub. This 13.9x difference suggests Browser Use has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Browser Use has 11,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Browser Use last updated 20 hours ago and Steel 11 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Browser Use uses Python while Steel leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Browser Use beginning 2 years ago and Steel 2 years ago.

Browser Use wins

Licensing

Browser Use uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Steel's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable