Ad
Learn more

Lightpanda vs Steel

Learn how Lightpanda and Steel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these browser automation for ai tools is best for you.

vs

Lightpanda

AI
Purpose-built headless browser that delivers 10x faster performance and 10x lower memory usage compared to Chrome headless for web automation and AI workflows.
41,580stars+5,414(+15%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    11 hours ago
  • Repository age

    4 years
  • Version

    1.0.3
  • License

    AGPL-3.0
  • Repository

    browser
Screenshot of Lightpanda

Steel

AI
Open-source browser infrastructure that lets AI agents and automation scripts control cloud browser fleets via a simple API, with built-in CAPTCHA solving and proxy management.
7,937stars+169(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Steel

Detailed Comparison

Lightpanda appears to have several advantages over Steel, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Lightpanda wins
Community & Popularity

Lightpanda significantly outpaces Steel in community adoption with 41,580 stars compared to 7,937 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Lightpanda has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Lightpanda has 2,063 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Lightpanda wins
Growth Momentum

Lightpanda is growing faster, adding 5,414 stars in the last 30 days (+15%) against adding 169 stars for Steel (+2.2%). Lightpanda is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Lightpanda last updated 11 hours ago and Steel 4 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Lightpanda uses Golang, Rust, Zig while Steel leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX.

Lightpanda wins
Project Maturity

Lightpanda has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Steel which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Lightpanda may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Steel uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Browser Automation for AI. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lightpanda also focuses on Scraping Platforms & SDKs, Browser Automation.

Steel wins
Hosting & Deployment

Steel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Lightpanda may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.