Learn how OpnForm and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.6.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
jhumanj/opnform
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
16 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
structr/structr
OpnForm appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpnForm significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 3,862 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests OpnForm has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpnForm has 555 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpnForm is growing faster, adding 118 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). OpnForm is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpnForm last updated 1 day ago and Structr 11 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpnForm uses PHP, Vue, Laravel, Nuxt.js while Structr leverages Java.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to OpnForm which began 4 years ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
OpnForm is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpnForm also focuses on Form Builders.
Both OpnForm and Structr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.