Learn how Ikiform and OpnForm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these form builder tools is best for you.

OpnForm appears to have several advantages over Ikiform, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpnForm significantly outpaces Ikiform in community adoption with 3,529 stars compared to 351 stars on GitHub. This 10.1x difference suggests OpnForm has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpnForm has 516 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpnForm shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Ikiform was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests OpnForm is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ikiform uses JSX, Next.js while OpnForm leverages Bash, Vue, PHP, Laravel, Nuxt.js.
OpnForm has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Ikiform which began 1 year ago. This 2.8-year head start suggests OpnForm may have more mature features and established processes.
Ikiform uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpnForm's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Form Builders. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpnForm extends into Low-Code/No-Code.
OpnForm provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ikiform may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository