Learn how OpenStack and Spinifex differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud computing services is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both OpenStack and Spinifex have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenStack significantly outpaces Spinifex in community adoption with 6,062 stars compared to 387 stars on GitHub. This 15.7x difference suggests OpenStack has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStack has 1,623 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Spinifex is growing faster, adding 202 stars in the last 30 days (+109%) against adding 26 stars for OpenStack (+0.4%). Spinifex is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStack last updated 11 hours ago and Spinifex 22 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Spinifex leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang.
OpenStack has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Spinifex which began 2 years ago. This 11.4-year head start suggests OpenStack may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenStack is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Spinifex uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Computing.
Spinifex provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenStack may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.