Learn how Spinifex and Ubicloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud computing services is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.24.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
mulgadc/spinifex
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ubicloud/ubicloud
Both Spinifex and Ubicloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ubicloud significantly outpaces Spinifex in community adoption with 12,407 stars compared to 413 stars on GitHub. This 30.0x difference suggests Ubicloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ubicloud has 601 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Spinifex is growing faster, adding 55 stars in the last 30 days (+15%) against adding 90 stars for Ubicloud (+0.7%). Spinifex is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Spinifex last updated 4 hours ago and Ubicloud 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Spinifex uses Typescript, JSX, Python while Ubicloud leverages JavaScript, Ruby.
Ubicloud has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Spinifex which began 2 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Ubicloud may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Computing.
Both Spinifex and Ubicloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.