Learn how Cozystack and Ubicloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud computing services is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.7.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
cozystack/cozystack
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ubicloud/ubicloud
Both Cozystack and Ubicloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ubicloud significantly outpaces Cozystack in community adoption with 12,407 stars compared to 2,390 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Ubicloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ubicloud has 601 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cozystack is growing faster, adding 136 stars in the last 30 days (+6%) against adding 90 stars for Ubicloud (+0.7%). Cozystack is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cozystack last updated 3 hours ago and Ubicloud 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ubicloud leverages JavaScript, CSS, Ruby.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cozystack beginning 3 years ago and Ubicloud 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Cozystack is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Ubicloud uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Computing.
Both Cozystack and Ubicloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.