Learn how Cozystack and Ubicloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud computing services is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.6.5License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
cozystack/cozystack
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ubicloud/ubicloud
Both Cozystack and Ubicloud have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ubicloud significantly outpaces Cozystack in community adoption with 12,322 stars compared to 2,364 stars on GitHub. This 5.2x difference suggests Ubicloud has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ubicloud has 595 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cozystack is growing faster, adding 132 stars in the last 30 days (+5.9%) against adding 9 stars for Ubicloud (+0.1%). Cozystack is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cozystack last updated 10 hours ago and Ubicloud 10 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Cozystack beginning 3 years ago and Ubicloud 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Cozystack is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Ubicloud uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Computing.
Both Cozystack and Ubicloud offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.