Learn how OpenStack and Ubicloud differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud computing services is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
openstack/openstack
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ubicloud/ubicloud
Ubicloud appears to have several advantages over OpenStack, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ubicloud leads in popularity with 12,407 stars vs 6,074 stars for OpenStack. The 104% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenStack has 1,625 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ubicloud is growing faster, adding 90 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 21 stars for OpenStack (+0.3%). Ubicloud is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenStack last updated 4 hours ago and Ubicloud 4 hours ago.
OpenStack uses Python while Ubicloud leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Golang, Ruby.
OpenStack has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Ubicloud which began 4 years ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests OpenStack may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenStack is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Ubicloud uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud Computing.
Ubicloud provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenStack may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.