Learn how Open-Notebook and SurfSense differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai research assistants is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Open-Notebook appears to have several advantages over SurfSense, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Open-Notebook leads in popularity with 40,226 stars vs 16,432 stars for SurfSense. The 145% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Open-Notebook has 4,659 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open-Notebook is growing faster, adding 1,299 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 278 stars for SurfSense (+1.7%). Open-Notebook is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Open-Notebook last updated 3 days ago and SurfSense 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Open-Notebook beginning 2 years ago and SurfSense 2 years ago.
Open-Notebook uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SurfSense's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Research Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: Open-Notebook also focuses on Data Platforms for AI, Note Taking & Knowledge Management while SurfSense extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both Open-Notebook and SurfSense offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.