Learn how n8n and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Both n8n and Structr have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
n8n significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 207,509 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 250.6x difference suggests n8n has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, n8n has 61,140 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
n8n is growing faster, adding 3,101 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against losing 1 stars for Structr (-0.1%). n8n is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with n8n last updated 4 hours ago and Structr 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: n8n uses SCSS, Vue while Structr leverages Java.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to n8n which began 7 years ago. This 8.5-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: n8n also focuses on Workflow Automation.
Both n8n and Structr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.