What is the main difference between Mathesar and Structr?

Mathesar and Structr are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Mathesar or Structr?

The choice between Mathesar and Structr depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Mathesar to Structr?

Migration between Mathesar and Structr is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

Mathesar vs Structr

Learn how Mathesar and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Mathesar

A self-hosted tool that provides an intuitive, spreadsheet-style interface for viewing, editing, and querying PostgreSQL databases without technical expertise.

Visit Mathesar Read more

5,158stars+24(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
0.12.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mathesar

Structr

Open-source low-code platform combining Neo4j graph database, visual schema editor, automatic REST APIs, and page rendering in one self-hosted environment.

Visit Structr Read more

828stars-2(-0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 days ago
Repository age
16 years
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
structr/structr

Detailed Comparison

Mathesar appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Mathesar wins

Community & Popularity

Mathesar significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 5,158 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 6.2x difference suggests Mathesar has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mathesar has 488 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Mathesar wins

Growth Momentum

Mathesar is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). Mathesar is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Mathesar last updated 17 hours ago and Structr 12 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mathesar uses Python, SCSS while Structr leverages Java.

Structr wins

Project Maturity

Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Mathesar which began 6 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.

Mathesar wins

Licensing

Mathesar is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Mathesar also focuses on Database Tools & GUIs.

Comparable