Learn how Jan and Khoj differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai personal assistants is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Khoj appears to have several advantages over Jan, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Jan having 44,052 stars and Khoj having 36,562 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Jan has 2,972 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Khoj is growing faster, adding 668 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 405 stars for Jan (+0.9%). Khoj is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Jan last updated 11 hours ago and Khoj 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Jan uses SCSS, Rust, Tauri while Khoj leverages Java.
Khoj has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Jan which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Khoj may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Jan is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Khoj uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Personal Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: Jan also focuses on AI Chat Interfaces, Local Model Runners while Khoj extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), AI Search Tools.
Both Jan and Khoj offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.