Learn how Khoj and Proton Lumo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai personal assistants is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Khoj appears to have several advantages over Proton Lumo, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Khoj significantly outpaces Proton Lumo in community adoption with 36,534 stars compared to 5,554 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Khoj has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Khoj has 2,386 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Khoj is growing faster, adding 658 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 0 stars for Proton Lumo (0%). Khoj is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Khoj last updated 17 days ago and Proton Lumo 1 day ago.
Proton Lumo has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Khoj which began 5 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests Proton Lumo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Khoj is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Proton Lumo uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Personal Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: Khoj also focuses on Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), AI Search Tools while Proton Lumo extends into AI Chat Interfaces.
Khoj provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Proton Lumo may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.