Learn how Hyvor Post and useSend differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
0.0.63License
AGPL-3.0Repository
hyvor/post
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.9.8License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
usesend/usesend
useSend appears to have several advantages over Hyvor Post, particularly in popularity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
useSend significantly outpaces Hyvor Post in community adoption with 4,753 stars compared to 34 stars on GitHub. This 139.8x difference suggests useSend has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, useSend has 440 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hyvor Post last updated 1 day ago and useSend 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hyvor Post uses PHP, SvelteKit while useSend leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hyvor Post beginning 2 years ago and useSend 3 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: useSend extends into Email Platforms.
useSend provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Hyvor Post may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.