Learn how Goose and OpenHands differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenHands appears to have several advantages over Goose, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenHands leads in popularity with 89,455 stars vs 54,756 stars for Goose. The 63% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenHands has 11,796 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenHands is growing faster, adding 3,807 stars in the last 30 days (+4.4%) against adding 137 stars for Goose (+0.3%). OpenHands is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Goose last updated 15 hours ago and OpenHands 11 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Goose beginning 2 years ago and OpenHands 3 years ago.
OpenHands uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Goose's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents. However, they also have distinct specializations: Goose also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Both Goose and OpenHands offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.