Learn how Frappe Helpdesk and Zammad differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Frappe Helpdesk and Zammad have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zammad leads in popularity with 5,856 stars vs 3,321 stars for Frappe Helpdesk. The 76% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zammad has 1,037 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe Helpdesk is growing faster, adding 73 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 89 stars for Zammad (+1.5%). Frappe Helpdesk is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Helpdesk last updated 2 days ago and Zammad 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe Helpdesk uses JSX, Python while Zammad leverages SCSS, PHP, Ruby, Perl, CoffeeScript.
Zammad has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Frappe Helpdesk which began 5 years ago. This 9.7-year head start suggests Zammad may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms, Helpdesk Software.