Learn how Frappe Helpdesk and Zammad differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v16.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
frappe/helpdesk
Last 30 days
Last commit
18 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zammad/zammad
Zammad appears to have several advantages over Frappe Helpdesk, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zammad leads in popularity with 6,092 stars vs 3,486 stars for Frappe Helpdesk. The 75% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zammad has 1,097 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Frappe Helpdesk and Zammad are moving at much the same rate, adding 61 stars and adding 99 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.8% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Frappe Helpdesk last updated 2 days ago and Zammad 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Frappe Helpdesk uses JSX, Python while Zammad leverages SCSS, PHP, Ruby, Perl, CoffeeScript.
Zammad has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Frappe Helpdesk which began 5 years ago. This 9.7-year head start suggests Zammad may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms, Helpdesk Software.
Zammad provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Frappe Helpdesk may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.