Learn how Freescout and Zammad differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Freescout and Zammad have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Freescout having 4,604 stars and Zammad having 6,017 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Zammad has 1,077 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Freescout and Zammad are moving at much the same rate, adding 63 stars and adding 89 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Freescout last updated 1 day ago and Zammad 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, SCSS, PHP, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Freescout uses Laravel while Zammad leverages CSS, Typescript, Ruby, Perl, CoffeeScript.
Zammad has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Freescout which began 8 years ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Zammad may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms, Helpdesk Software.
Both Freescout and Zammad offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.