Learn how Flipt and GrowthBook differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feature flag tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

GrowthBook appears to have several advantages over Flipt, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
GrowthBook leads in popularity with 8,139 stars vs 4,873 stars for Flipt. The 67% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, GrowthBook has 815 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
GrowthBook is growing faster, adding 130 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 22 stars for Flipt (+0.5%). GrowthBook is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flipt last updated 12 hours ago and GrowthBook 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flipt uses Golang while GrowthBook leverages Python, Next.js, SCSS.
Flipt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to GrowthBook which began 5 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Flipt may have more mature features and established processes.
GrowthBook uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Flipt's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feature Flags. However, they also have distinct specializations: GrowthBook extends into Product Analytics.
Both Flipt and GrowthBook offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.