Learn how Flagsmith and Flipt differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feature flag tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Flagsmith and Flipt have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Flagsmith having 6,542 stars and Flipt having 4,891 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Flagsmith has 565 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Flagsmith and Flipt are moving at much the same rate, adding 36 stars and adding 23 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flagsmith last updated 12 hours ago and Flipt 22 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Flagsmith uses Python, Next.js, SCSS while Flipt leverages Golang.
Flipt has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Flagsmith which began 8 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Flipt may have more mature features and established processes.
Flagsmith uses the BSD-3-Clause license, which is more permissive than Flipt's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feature Flags. However, they also have distinct specializations: Flagsmith also focuses on PaaS & Deployment Tools.
Both Flagsmith and Flipt offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.