Learn how Flectar Mail and Roundcube differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
23 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v0.1.0-alpha.7License
AGPL-3.0Repository
flectar/mail
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Roundcube appears to have several advantages over Flectar Mail, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Roundcube significantly outpaces Flectar Mail in community adoption with 7,242 stars compared to 1,622 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Roundcube has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,803 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Flectar Mail is growing faster, adding 507 stars in the last 30 days (+45%) against adding 16 stars for Roundcube (+0.2%). Flectar Mail is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Flectar Mail last updated 23 hours ago and Roundcube 1 day ago.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Flectar Mail which began 2 months ago. This 14.5-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Flectar Mail is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Roundcube uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.
Roundcube provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Flectar Mail may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.