Learn how Mailspring and Roundcube differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Stars
17,939+0.1%Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.26.2License
GPL-3.0Repository
mailspring
Stars
7,239+0.2%Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Both Mailspring and Roundcube have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mailspring leads in popularity with 17,939 stars vs 7,239 stars for Roundcube. The 148% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,801 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Mailspring and Roundcube are moving at much the same rate, adding 10 stars and adding 13 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.1% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mailspring last updated 4 hours ago and Roundcube 7 hours ago.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Mailspring which began 10 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.
Roundcube provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Mailspring may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.