Learn how Mailspring and Twake Mail differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
1.26.2License
GPL-3.0Repository
mailspring
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.37.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
tmail-flutter
Both Mailspring and Twake Mail have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Mailspring significantly outpaces Twake Mail in community adoption with 18,003 stars compared to 666 stars on GitHub. This 27.0x difference suggests Mailspring has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Mailspring has 1,065 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Twake Mail is growing faster, adding 9 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 74 stars for Mailspring (+0.4%). Twake Mail is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Mailspring last updated 5 hours ago and Twake Mail 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Objective-C, Swift. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Mailspring uses Typescript, JSX, Python, PHP, MATLAB while Twake Mail leverages C, Java, Ruby, Kotlin, Dart.
Mailspring has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Twake Mail which began 5 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests Mailspring may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Mailspring is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Twake Mail uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.