Learn how Roundcube and Twake Mail differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Stars
7,239+0.2%Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.37.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
tmail-flutter
Roundcube appears to have several advantages over Twake Mail, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Roundcube significantly outpaces Twake Mail in community adoption with 7,239 stars compared to 660 stars on GitHub. This 11.0x difference suggests Roundcube has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,801 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Twake Mail is growing faster, adding 6 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 13 stars for Roundcube (+0.2%). Twake Mail is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Roundcube last updated 7 hours ago and Twake Mail 14 hours ago.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Twake Mail which began 5 years ago. This 9.3-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Roundcube is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Twake Mail uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.
Roundcube provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Twake Mail may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.