Learn how Roundcube and UnInbox differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Stars
7,239+0.2%Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Last 30 days

Roundcube appears to have several advantages over UnInbox, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Roundcube significantly outpaces UnInbox in community adoption with 7,239 stars compared to 1,760 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Roundcube has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,801 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Roundcube and UnInbox are moving at much the same rate, adding 13 stars and adding 4 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Roundcube shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while UnInbox was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Roundcube is being more actively maintained.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to UnInbox which began 3 years ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Roundcube is licensed under GPL-3.0 while UnInbox uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients. However, they also have distinct specializations: UnInbox extends into Team Chat & Messaging.
Both Roundcube and UnInbox offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.