Learn how Bulwark Mail and Roundcube differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
8 monthsVersion
1.17.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
bulwarkmail/webmail
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Both Bulwark Mail and Roundcube have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Roundcube significantly outpaces Bulwark Mail in community adoption with 7,242 stars compared to 1,343 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Roundcube has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,803 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bulwark Mail is growing faster, adding 131 stars in the last 30 days (+11%) against adding 16 stars for Roundcube (+0.2%). Bulwark Mail is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bulwark Mail last updated 1 day ago and Roundcube 1 day ago.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Bulwark Mail which began 8 months ago. This 14.1-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Bulwark Mail is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Roundcube uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.
Both Bulwark Mail and Roundcube offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.